![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i1.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3851.jpg?fit=1200%2C903)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![A young woman photographer with a Nikon D2x around her neck smiles at the camera Stock Photo - Alamy A young woman photographer with a Nikon D2x around her neck smiles at the camera Stock Photo - Alamy](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/E8YC1M/a-young-woman-photographer-with-a-nikon-d2x-around-her-neck-smiles-E8YC1M.jpg)
A young woman photographer with a Nikon D2x around her neck smiles at the camera Stock Photo - Alamy
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i0.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3874.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i2.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3892.jpg)